One of the key features we mentioned above was the relative size of the player pools at each site. In most types of online gambling, you don’t have to concern yourself with how many players are logging into the same site that you are: it doesn’t really change your experience if you’re the only one there or one of thousands enjoying your favorite slot machine, for instance.
But when it comes to poker, this is a critical aspect to choosing a site. The game simply doesn’t work unless you have opponents to play against: and the more of them there are, the better. A few other players may be all you need to get a solid game together, but not all of them will likely be on at the same time or want to play in the game and stakes you’re looking for.
That’s why player liquidity is so huge at any poker room. It becomes all the more important when you talk about games that are less popular. Texas Hold’em games are always easy to find, at least at low stakes; on the other hand, a niche game like Razz might be hard to find even during peak hours.
Of the sites we mentioned above, both Betcoin and BetOnline offer fairly large player pools. As we mentioned, the Winning Network (which includes Betcoin) has the highest average traffic of any US-facing network today (only Bodog, an independent room, surpasses it), while Chico – the network that BetOnline is a part of – averages nearly 500 cash game players at any given time, enough to maintain a fairly healthy ecosystem. Conversely, SWCPoker and Fortune Jack are much less populated, usually containing fewer than 100 cash game players. However, both of these sites see more traffic for tournament play – something that is generally true across the industry at most sites.
How important this is to you will depend largely on exactly what it is you want to play. Each game has a different level of popularity, and thus can be more or less sensitive to player liquidity issues. Here’s a quick look at what you might want to consider based on your favorite games:
Texas Hold’em: If there’s one game that can survive a small player pool, the “Cadillac of Poker” is it. This is particularly true for tournament pools and small stakes cash games, which are spread even during off peak hours at all but the very smallest rooms. If you want to play at high stakes, however, you’ll probably need a good player base to support those games – or you’ll have to know when the regulars show up to get a table together.
Omaha: This action game has become increasingly popular, especially in Pot Limit formats. That has been enough to ensure that it is usually spread at even small rooms during peak hours. However, high limit games are harder to come by, and off-peak games may not be available at all during slower parts of the day at small rooms.
Other Games: In terms of popularity, everything else can be lumped in below the above two games. A case could be made that Seven Card Stud is a little more common than anything else in this category, but that’s increasingly untrue as other variants have gained in popularity in recent years. Regardless, all of these games pretty much need a healthy and large player pool in order to see any consistent action. Some smaller rooms won’t even bother with these games, as there simply isn’t enough interest to support them. Where they do exist, cash game coverage may be spotty, and tournaments are usually sparsely attended except during some special events or festivals.